1 September 2014

Inquiry

This post by Australian physics and maths teacher Harry Webb on his blog Webs of Substance is a critical discussion of inquiry or discovery learning.

Unlike the author, who has an axe to grind with constructivist education theories, I happen to be much in favour of discovery learning. This does not mean that I propose to replace all of the more usual teaching methods by discovery or inquiry, or whatever it is called. Rather, I believe, there is a time and place for every method.

The quality of education should not be measured by cognitive results alone. However important, education is about more than just that. Professor Gert Biesta, in his book ‘The Beautiful Risk of Education‘, argues that good education is world oriented. It consists of three domains, in addition to providing young people with knowledge, skills and understanding (qualification), education serves to support students to become members of and part of particular social, cultural and political traditions (socialisation) and to develop as autonomous, responsible and independent adults (‘Bildung’ or subjectification).

Discovery learning can be very effective, even in physics classes – if I may say so, Harry, as a physics teacher myself – to help students ask questions and develop critical thinking. The really interesting problems in science, technology and art have more than just one solution. In my opinion then, education should not be about providing the right answers, but about asking the right questions. 

Every teacher should use the methods he or she feels most comfortable with, provided they are effective. And effective meaning: capable of stimulating students’ development in the three domains mentioned above. I believe that, ideally, a teacher should have more than just one teaching method up his sleeve, using guided instruction one time and discovery learning the next, as the occasion calls for.

Although I do not agree with Webb’s criticism of Inquiry, I recommend reading his post and particularly the discussion below it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

About Dick van der Wateren

Sinds voorjaar 2017 heb ik een filosofische praktijk, De Verwondering, in Amsterdam. Daar heb ik gesprekken met volwassenen zowel als jongeren. Ik sta voor de klas op het Eerste Christelijk Lyceum in Haarlem en begeleid dagelijks talentvolle en begaafde leerlingen die meer uitdaging nodig hebben, of coach leerlingen die een probleem hebben waar we samen een oplossing voor vinden. Ik heb een jarenlange ervaring als aardwetenschapper (o.a. in Antarctica en Afrika) en wetenschapsvoorlichter. Werken met jongeren is mijn passie. Voor mij zijn tieners zo'n beetje de leukste mensen. Ze hebben een enorme levenslust, zijn creatief, hebben originele ideeën - soms op het bizarre af - en kunnen zich nog alle kanten op ontwikkelen. Ik beschouw het als een voorrecht aan die ontwikkeling te kunnen bijdragen.

Category

English, onderwijs, onderzoek

Tags