Today, in our mythbusting series, we look at ‘scientifically-founded’ claims about differences between the male and the female brains. It’s a recurrent theme in publications about health as well as education, ‘studies show’ followed by some claim about a new remedy to cure all ailments.

IMG_2054.JPGCaryl Rivers and Rosalind Barnett busted a popular neuromyth about men and women in an article for the online tech news, reviews and analysis site re/code. Here’s the first part of their article:

“Myths about differences between the brains of men and women never seem to die, and the most popular ones raise real issues for women in tech, math and science.

The most recent entry in the gender-brain sweepstakes is the BBC, with a series called “Is Your Brain Male or Female?” Stories and interviews about the series have already been featured in the U.S. on public radio stations.

In one such interview, Michael Mosley, a British physician and BBC TV host, claimed that “studies” have found that men are better at “systemizing,” while women are better at empathizing.”

Caryl Rivers and Rosalind C. Barnett are the authors of “The New Soft War on Women: How the Myth of Female Ascendance Is Hurting Women, Men — and Our Economy” (Tarcher/Penguin).
Read the remaining part of their article here.

This article is exemplary for the way to treat myths, neuro or otherwise. Find the original scientific paper (if it exists at all!), check the data on which the myth is based and find studies that tried to replicate the findings of the original study. In most cases it’s really not difficult and if in doubt, find someone who is familiar with the problem. Readers of this blog are welcome to ask us for help. Just use the contact form.

Dorothy Bishop

And while we’re at it, let’s also listen to Dorothy Bishop, Professor of Developmental Neuropsychology, Oxford University, who gave a talk at researchED 2014, recently, about the (ir)relevance of neuroscience for education. Her advice, if there’s a brain picture in an article or presentation about education, your best bet is not to believe any of the claims made by the author or speaker. The fancier the brain picture, the more outrageous the claims. Some brain training programmes are the snake oil remedies of our time, claiming to cure almost any learning disorder and a few other mental problems on the side.

For those who enjoy lucid stories about real brain science I recommend following BishopBlog and on Twitter deevybee.

These are a few of the tips by co-blogger Pedro De Bruyckere from his blog.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Abonneren op

Deze site gebruikt Akismet om spam te verminderen. Bekijk hoe je reactie-gegevens worden verwerkt.

1 Reactie
oudste meest gestemd
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

About Dick van der Wateren

Als blogger en onderwijsauteur denk ik na over onderwijs en pedagogiek. In 2016 verscheen bij Uitgeverij Ten Brink mijn boek 'Verwondering' waarin ik een lans breek voor onderwijs op basis van vragen die leerlingen zelf bedenken. In 2020 verscheen mijn boek De Denkende Klas bij LannooCampus met praktische aanwijzingen om met leerlingen dieper te denken. Als vo-docent heb ik talentvolle en begaafde leerlingen begeleid die meer uitdaging nodig hebben, en leerlingen gecoacht met diverse problemen - onderpresteren, perfectionisme, levensvragen. Na een lang leven in het onderwijs en de wetenschap ben ik in 2017 een filosofische praktijk begonnen, De Verwondering, in Amsterdam. Daar heb ik gesprekken met volwassenen zowel als jongeren over levensvragen, zingeving, werk, studie, relaties.


English, evidence-based, onderzoek, psychologie


, , , ,