Spam that was Helpful!

Every day I get a basket full of spam-emails that usually fit into one of four major categories:

  • Invitations to conferences (You are a great scientist and we would love to have you as an invited / guest speaker at our conference but pay your own way).
  • Invitations to submit to some new – possibly predatory – journal (We read your brilliant article ZZZ and would like to have you submit similar research to our journal; it only costs $XX). This is complicated by the fact that two other scientists with the same name as mine, one with the same middle initial too (!), were in the field of medicine so it can be for a journal of oncology, gynaecology or whatever.
  • Invitations to be a board member of a new – again possibly predatory – journal.
  • Offers from companies to make my life easier with respect to publishing, specifically for editing services. It is from this last category that, possibly for the first time, something useful was in the email.

Below is a set of 12 rules-of-thumb for writing a scientific paper from the fourth category which actually is useful. At the end of this blog, you’ll see why!

  1. Consolidate all the information. Ensure you have everything you need to write efficiently, i.e., all data, references, drafts of tables and figures, etc.
  2. Target a journal. Determine the journal to which you plan to submit your manuscript and write your manuscript according to the focus of the targeted journal. The focus may be clearly stated within the journal or may be determined by examining several recent issues of the targeted journal.
  3. Start writing. When writing the first draft, the goal is to put something down on paper, so it does not matter if sentences are incomplete and the grammar incorrect, provided that the main points and ideas have been captured. Write when your energy is high, not when you are tired. Try to find a time and place where you can think and write without distractions.
  4. Write quickly. Don’t worry about words, spelling or punctuation at all at this stage, just ideas. Keep going. Leave gaps if necessary. Try to write quickly, to keep the flow going. Use abbreviations and leave space for words that do not come to mind immediately.
  5. Write in your own voice. Expressing yourself in your own way will help you to say what you mean more precisely. It will be easier for your reader if they can “hear” your voice.
  6. Write without editing. Don’t try to get it right the first time. Resist the temptation to edit as you go. Otherwise, you will tend to get stuck and waste time. If you try to write and edit at the same time, you will do neither well.
  7. Keep to the plan of your outline. Use the headings from your outline to focus what you want to say. If you find yourself wandering from the point, stop and move on to the next topic in the outline.
  8. Write the paper in parts. Don’t attempt to write the whole manuscript at once, instead, treat each section as a mini-essay. Look at your notes, think about the goal of that particular section and what you want to accomplish and say.
  9. Put the first draft aside. Put aside your first draft for at least one day. The idea of waiting a day or more is to allow you to “be” another person. It is difficult to proofread and edit your own work; a day or more between creation and critique helps.
  10. Revise it. Revise it and be prepared to do this several times until you feel it is not possible to improve it further. The objective is to look at your work not as its author, but as a respectful but stern critic. Does each sentence make sense? In your longer sentences, can you keep track of the subject at hand? Do your longer paragraphs follow a single idea, or can they be broken into smaller paragraphs? These are some of the questions you should ask yourself.
  11. Revise for clarity and brevity. Revise sentences and paragraphs with special attention to clearness. For maximum readability, most sentences should be about 15-20 words. For a scientific article, paragraphs of about 150 words in length are considered optimal. Avoid using unnecessary words.
  12. Be consistent. Often a manuscript has more than one author and therefore the writing may be shared. However, the style needs to be consistent throughout. The first author must go through the entire manuscript and make any necessary editorial changes before submitting the manuscript to the journal.

P.S. While the editing company claimed copyright, I found these steps in a number of places on the Internet, including a published article (see footnote[1] for the citation and links for downloading it.). Based on this fact I’ll add a thirteenth rule:

  1. Don’t plagiarise and claim authorship. Always cite your sources, as plagiarism is a capital offence in the scientific world!

Finally, a few years ago I gave a workshop on how to write a scientific article which was captured and put on YouTube.

[1] Michel, L.A. (2012) How to prepare a scientific surgical paper: a practical approach. Acta Chirurgica Belgica, 112, 323-339. https://doi.org/10.1080/00015458.2012.11680848
Available via: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233766120_How_to_Prepare_a_Scientific_Surgical_Paper_A_practical_approach

Paul A. Kirschner's avatar

Over Paul A. Kirschner

Nederlands: Paul A. Kirschner (1951) is Emeritus hoogleraar Onderwijspsychologie aan de Open Universiteit (Nederland), eredoctor (doctor honoris causa) aan Oulu University (Finland), Gastprofessor aan de Thomas More Hogeschool (België) en eigenaar van kirschner-ED. Hij was eerder Universiteitshoogleraar en hoogleraar Onderwijspsychologie aan de Open Universiteit, Visiting Professor Onderwijs met een leerstoel in Leren en Interactie in de Lerarenopleiding aan Oulu University, hoogleraar Onderwijswetenschappen aan de Universiteit Utrecht, hoogleraar Contact- en Afstandsonderwijs aan de Universiteit Maastricht en Visiting Professor aan de Open University of Catalonia (Spain). Hij is een internationaal erkende expert op zijn gebied met meer dan 350 wetenschappelijke publicaties. Hij heeft zitting gehad in de Onderwijsraad in de periode 2000-2004 en de Wetenschappelijk Technische Raad van SURF van 2009-2019. Hij is Fellow van de American Educational Research Association (NB de eerste Europeaan aan wie deze eer werd toegekend), de International Society of the Learning Sciences en de Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study in the Humanities and Social Science of the Royal Dutch Academy of Sciences (NIAS-KNAW). Hij was president van de International Society of the Learning Sciences in de periode 2010-2011. Hij is hoofdredacteur van de Journal of Computer Assisted Learning en commissioning editor van Computers in Human Behavior. Hij heeft veel boeken (mede)geschreven, o.a. Ten steps to complex learning (Routledge/Erlbaum), Op de Schouders van Reuzen en Wijze Lessen: Twaalf Bouwstenen voor Effectieve Didactiek (beiden gratis verkrijgbaar op het web), twee boeken over mythes in het onderwijs Jongens zijn Slimmer dan Meisjes XL en Juffen zijn Toffer dan Meesters (beiden ook in het Engels verschenen), Evidence Informed Learning Design, and How Learning Happens: Seminal Works in Educational Psychology and What They Mean in Practice. Hij schrift ook regelmatig voor Didactief (de kolom KirschnerKiest over wat docenten kunnen met wetenschappelijke resultaten). Hij wordt gezien als expert op veel gebieden en vooral het ontwerpen van effectief, efficiënt en bevredigend onderwijs, computerondersteund samenwerkend leren (CSCL), mediagebruik in het onderwijs en het verwerven van complex cognitieve vaardigheden. English: Paul A. Kirschner, dr.h.c. (1951) is Emeritus Professor Educational Psychology at the Open University of the Netherlands, Guest Professor at the Thomas More University of Applied Science in Mechelen, Belgium, Honorary Doctor (Doctor Honoris Causa) at the University of Oulu, Finland, and owner of kirschner-ED which carries out educational consultancy, masterclasses for teachers, school heads and educational policy makers, and keynotes/presentations at conferences and other educational get-togethers. He is a Research Fellow of the American Educational Research Association, the International Society of the Learning Sciences, and the Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study in the Humanities and Social Science. He is a past President (2010-2011) of the International Society of the Learning Sciences and former member of the Dutch Educational Council and the Scientific Technical Council of the Foundation for University Computing Facilities (SURF WTR). He is chief editor of Journal of Computer Assisted Learning and commissioning editor of Computers in Human Behavior. He has also published more than 350 scientific articles as well as many popular articles for teacher journals. As for books, he is co-author of How Learning Happens: Seminal Works in Educational Psychology, Evidence Informed Learning Design, Urban Myths about Learning and Education and More Urban Myths about Learning and Education as well as of the highly successful book Ten Steps to Complex Learning, and editor of two other books (Visualizing Argumentation and What we know about CSCL). He is seen as an expert in many areas and in particular the design of effective, efficient and enjoyable education, computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL), media use in education, and the acquisition of complex cognitive skills.

Eén reactie naar “Spam that was Helpful!”

  1. Onbekend's avatar

    Ter aanvulling als stap 0 om vooraf de structuur van het artikel te bepalen. Dit zorgt voor een duidelijke afbakening en focus. Je kunt dan eerst de informatie in steekwoorden verdelen over de verschillende paragrafen, zodat alles een plek krijgt. Dan hoef je daar niet meer over na te denken tijdens het schrijven.
    Een handige structuur (met schrijftips) voor technische onderwerpen is bijvoorbeeld deze: https://cse.unl.edu/~goddard/WritingResources/Templates/Generic-Technical-Paper-Skeleton.html

    Like

Geef een reactie of deel je eigen ervaringen. Graag met je volledige naam en achternaam ondertekenen, geen pseudoniemen. Anonieme reacties worden verwijderd.